May 31, 2009
End of an era!!
May 16, 2009
Instant Analysis
May 5, 2009
Practice Management
Apr 30, 2009
A Riddle
Mar 30, 2009
Bad Calls
Feb 28, 2009
Jan 26, 2009
The Republic Day Debate
I have been partial to the idea of India being a presidential system of democracy since childhood. The notion that generally a presidential system of government will be good for India was more a reflection of the fact that the parliamentary system of government did not yield the proper results. Mark you, those were the days of Gujaral and Devegowda so I was not that far off the mark. However, the more I read about the presidential form of government, the less convinced I am about the merits of the system. For example, for one of the most developed economies, US has one of the most underdeveloped governance mechanism. I think that is because of the transition issues arising primarily out of presidential system of executive appointments for apolitical jobs. West Europe on reasonable parameters of governance seems ahead. I have personally seen the side effects of this kind of practice in Sri Lanka where the governance system is quite weak again political appointees playing a helping hand in the same. One other factoid that we must keep in mind is this. You realize that, while the presidential system may bring additional stability, does India has a civil society which could keep the executive in check. India doesn’t seem to have the wherewithal to handle petty goons of MNS or Ram Sena, let alone withstand the assault the presidential system. So all in all, I say lets stick to the Parliamentary system as of now.
Jan 23, 2009
Obama Part Deux
Jan 20, 2009
The New US administration and India
Jan 18, 2009
Use of Analogies
Jan 17, 2009
Bloggers block is back
Dec 31, 2008
2009
Dec 25, 2008
The Meta Narrative of Movie Stars
Dec 22, 2008
A deal is a deal
Dec 7, 2008
Emphemeriality of the Medium
Nov 5, 2008
Nov 2, 2008
The Other Champion
90s was the decade of Sachin. Frankly, Indians hardly tried to maintain an equivalency between the batting and fielding side of its growing cricket fascination. Kapil was famous in the early part of the decade but everyone understood that the main bowling weapon India had was kumble. I think the years 92-95 kumble was at this peak. I can remember ODIs where batsmen just played out kumble and kumble figures will be something like 10- 2- 29-2. Those were the days when reputed players like Andrew Hudson were afraid of kumble and new players like Richard blake’s reputation was destroyed.
The one bane of Kumble came was the South African players Cronje and Cullinan. They suddenly learned how to play Kumble and then the reputation was destroyed by Aravinda, jayasurya, Mahanama etc.
As you must have heard, Anil Kumble has retired from international Cricket. This has sort of more that anything started the drumbeat which should soon drown out Dravid and Laxman. But all that for later. Lets focus on Kumble
Kumble about 5-6 years to become the bowler he was in 2006 when I thought he was at the peak of his second coming. But this second coming was more the evidence of his grit and cricketing acumen. He fin ally developed a ball which actually spun…his googly which actually deviated from the pitch. This delivery more than anything else Kumble to have his golden summer where he is past 600 wickets and captained India to wins, notably against Aussies in Perth.
From all this, what I want to arrive at is…Kumble was a world beater for around 7-8 years but unfortunately in India he was eclipsed by Batting starts such as Sachin Ganguly, Azhar etc while the world saw two better spinners in Warne and Murali which sort of made the title of this past “The other champion” rather than “the champion” which may have been the case in some other country or some other era
Oct 24, 2008
News for tomorrow
Working with Pakistan and India to try to resolve, and Kashmir, crisis in a serious way. Those are all critical tasks for the next administration. Kashmir in particular is an interesting situation where that is obviously a potential tar pit diplomatically. But, for us to devote serious diplomatic resources to get a special envoy in there, to figure out a plausible approach, and essentially make the argument to the Indians, you guys are on the brink of being an economic superpower, why do you want to keep on messing with this? To make the argument to the Pakistanis, look at India and what they are doing, why do you want to keep n being bogged down with this particularly at a time where the biggest threat now is coming from the Afghan boarder?
Now, I am pretty sure, this is a shift from the current US policy. India has in the past strongly objected to the presence of a special envoy for Kashmir. My take here is that Obama is being lazy. He understands that the issue is much more complex, but he thinks he can strengthen his pragmatic image here by trying to showcase some opportunity of movement in Kashmir. I am sure, Obama himself will realize is that his current proposal sounds like giving candy to the nuisance maker so that he may keep quiet. I am sure he will realize that this strategy seldom works.